Justice for Jean Charles de Menezes! |
Helen Shaw, co-director INQUEST |
|
|
Questions have been asked about how there can be a "shoot to kill"
policy on the streets of London. Why has police policy changed without,
parliamentary scrutiny? Why has misleading information about Jean Charles
remained uncorrected by the police? Shouldn't the public be told the truth?
These questions echo those raised by the de Menezes family and many other
families whose relatives have died after police shootings or deaths involving
other weapons or force. Everyone who shares these concerns should ensure
that this death is the one that makes a difference. As has happened in previous cases the pattern of misinformation ,put into the public domain sought to imply Mr de Menezes is somehow to blame for his own death and to justify the decision to shoot. The comment by Ian Blair that this may happen again and its implication that we have to accept deaths as one of the risks of policing London are really alarming. It appears to pre-judge the outcome of the investigation into the death and also to argue that this "shoot to kill" policy is necessary and justified. But it is a violation of the "presumption of innocence" -the most fundamental principle of British law -and is contrary to all international human rights standards. In February 2005 Ian Blair, Metropolitan Police Commissioner suggested police officers who shoot someone in the line of duty should be granted immunity from prosecution for murder in some cases. He tried to stop the Independent Police Complaints Commission investigation into the death despite the fact that regulations require referral to the IPCC within 24 hours and despite the fact that the shooting of Jean Charles occurred under a new and secret policy which meant that the independence of the investigation was even more crucial. One of the main reasons the IPCC was set up was to stop the police investigating themselves. Voices of concern and criticism must not be silenced by the wider concerns about public safety. The two are not mutually exclusive. The facts remain that an innocent man was shot dead by the police. The police cannot act as judge, jury and executioner whatever the context. The role of politicians and the public is to debate, scrutinise and ultimately make democratic decisions about the policy framework in which police make operational decisions. The police cannot perform that function for themselves. We should continue to raise critical concerns, insist on democratic, robust, rigorous and external scrutiny of police conduct and support the family of Jean Charles de Menezes in their quest for justice. INQUEST www.inquest.org.uk |
||